TRY HARD
When I'm asked what my favorite Christmas movie is, I usually say Die Hard. And I mean it. It's also one of the very best action movies ever done as well as a great character driven story. Die Hard, like Star Wars and the first Matrix changed movies to one degree or another. After the first Die Hard came out, everyone was looking for a "Die Hard in a...." movie. Submarine. Airplane. etc. A million things. Until the phrase "Die Hard in a..." became so generic one development person is said to have requested "Die Hard in an office building" forgetting the original. The second and third Die Hard movies, however, like the second and third Matrix movies, well, sucked.
Die Hard one works because it places a very real person in a horrible situation. Its genius was that the character - for very plausible reasons - was not wearing shoes. He was sadly vulnerable. As he took apart a criminal ring John McClane never strayed from being human. He didn't have super powers. He didn't do anything that defied reality. He was trying to survive and save his wife at the same point. But you believed what was going on because you believed any ordinary - albeit very fit - human could have done the same.
Die Hard 2 &3 changed that. The character did things that defied physics. Way defied physics. He was thrown something like 100 feet in the air, crashed to the ground and survived and kept fighting. That the stories made little sense also hurt. That they repeated the estranged wife plot also hurt. After what John does in the first movie, those two should have simply been together. The stories lacked credibility, the characters weren't right, and the franchise went south.
Now the non-sensible title, Live Free or Die Hard has come out and once again John is doing things that defy physics. He survives beatings and more that would stagger Superman let alone a real person in his late 40s, early 50s, as Bruce Willis is. Yet, somehow, I enjoyed this movie whereas I hated 2&3. Yes, there was CGI everywhere. Characters did things that were impossible. The overall scheme really pushes all my buttons the wrong way, but the simple story of trying to save his daughter resonated. The action, although ridiculous, was fun this time. This was a massive cartoon of improbably and ludicrous stunt work, but it worked because unlike in 2 & 3 I cared about the characters.
So maybe the real reason I hated 2&3 wasn't that John McClane defied physics and believability, but because I didn't care about John McClane, whereas this time I do. I am not someone who likes things because at one point in my life I liked it. I like SF, but not all. I like action movies, but the fact that a film is an action movie won't get me to see it. I like a few Westerns, but if you asked if I'm a western fan I'd say no. Genres don't do anything for me; individual movies do. So I wasn't looking forward to Live free or Die Hard because I liked the original. I went in not caring about the commercials, but I left enjoying it. It's no Die Hard, but it's what I like to call bigdumbfun. And sometimes that's enough.
Labels: Live free of Die Hard








